Sunday, November 22, 2015

A631.5.4.RB_DellElceCamila

A631.5.4.RB – Leading System Wide Change

No Respect for “Status-Quo”

            It is not a surprise or secret how difficult it is for a leader to grow into an individual with the sufficient skills to lead a system-wide change effectively. There are so many obstacles that will always try to be on the way and interrupt the progress. And only a few, very few, will defied the odds and will push forward into the impossible. One of the greatest examples that tried to over come those difficult times and failed and then succeed again after many attempts is Mr. Steve Jobs. He truly wanted to be unique in every single way possible. His ambition pushed others into striving for the impossible. Nevertheless, his strict demanding persona pushed others to hate him and even have his on company fired him.

            A successful leader can transmit many different things, but a successful organization is ultimately linked to monetary performance. The level of impact coming from a person can determine leadership. Impact is the amount of change coming from an influence. In this case a leader can be measured by the amount of change that happens in an organization. Without change, what is the benefit of a good leader? Therefore, leaders may climb to their positions during periods of poor performance. Striking out in new ways, a bold leader may make a good name for themselves and provide many good reasons why they are the leader, but the application of change management in a struggle is significantly different than using an organizational intervention to improve efficiencies.

            Changes in a learning organization, for example, are constantly occurring as the organization constantly observes and corrects where it lacked good performance. Also predicting where problems can possibly arise, learning organizations improve where it is not apparently necessary. In cases where a major struggle is not apparent, bold leadership means implementing change processes when they are not obviously needed. A good sign of leadership also means conducting surveys and providing feedback. Constant evaluation allows for problems below the surface to become apparent where something can be done about it. This means assessing the state of the organization, policies and procedures, job satisfaction and morale, and problems that hinder people from doing their jobs and satisfying customers (Brown, 2011, p. 374).

            Reengineering is a change process implemented system-wide and involves radical change to processes that hinder top performance. This is a behavior and change process that can be easier to come to bold leadership. It is, knowing when to use the appropriate intervention that counts. Rensis Likert provides that a leader can use a system of survey questionnaires to identify the type of leadership in the organization (Brown, 2011, p. 380). Working toward empowered employees in the organization improves their effectively.

            As the apple commercial mentioned, those who are misfit and different, the outcastes; those are the true leaders. Those who have “no respect for status quo” (1997). In order to proceed with change processes, one must be fearless. The leader who is in the constant lookout for the next new “thing” or innovation will find him or her self turning the impossible into something very possible. Paul Arnold (2015) suggested that, “To be effective, organizational change must be able to genuinely transform the business. Yet in the relentless search for new techniques to revolutionize the way things are done, and in the haste to manage technological discontinuities, many organizations fail to adequately develop, communicate and execute their vision for the change” (para. 10). Leading system wide changes it’s not about knowing what to do in every situation, but knowing that working a as team would lead to better successes as a whole.

References

Apple - Think Different (1997) (YouTube). Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmwXdGm89Tk

Brown, D. R. (2011). An experiential approach to organization development (8th edition.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Arnold, P. (2015) "Evidence and leading indicators of change success", Strategic Direction, Vol. 31 Iss: 10, pp.1 – 5 DOI http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.libproxy.db.erau.edu/10.1108/SD-08-2015-0128


No comments:

Post a Comment