Sunday, October 25, 2015

A631.1.5.RB_DellElceCamila

A631.1.5.RB – EcoSeagate

            After reviewing the Eco Seagate videos and reading about the OD application: EcoSeagate and team development, it really brings fresh air. It is the first time experiencing this kind of team encouragement and it really impressed me. The Eco Seagate experiences come from the CEO, Bill Watkins who started experiencing with these activities back in 2000. Every year, Mr. Watkins recruits about 200 of his employees and travels to New Zealand. The purpose of traveling this far is to have each individual feel foreign and intimidated by the environment, which has desolated mountains and glaciers to say the least, making every feel “off balance and no one has an advantage over anyone else” (Brown, 2011, p. 274). In other words, employees’ titles do not mean anything where they are located at that time.

            Watkins wanted to prove that there is value in teamwork, and mentioned, “I learned a lesson a long time ago in the Army. Nobody really wants to die for their god. No one wants to die for their country. Absolutely no one wants to die for money. But people put their lives on the line for the respect of their platoon mates” (Brown, 2011, p. 274). There is significant value to this type of team development as it creates very fundamental lessons such as trust, commitment, and taking risk when it is worth it. “Trust comes with mutual respect and not with agreement” (Chao, 2008). Nevertheless, teams lack the acknowledgment of the mentioned fundamentals and usually fail when they are assigned to teams.  

            Consequently, in some instances the difference between failure and success land on the presence and absence of specific team processes and how or where they occur. Jehn and Mannix for example, examined the dynamics of how team performance relate to the nature of group conflict. Their evaluation showed, “significant variations between high and low performing teams in their timing of different types of conflict engagement. As a consequence of these results, Jehn and Mannix concluded that team conflict must be examined as a dynamic rather than static process” (Miller, 2003, para. 5). Conversely, organizations are routinely making changes in social and work processes and the need to understand this changes is important but it is even more important to move with this changes.  Therefore, Brown (2011, p. 271) points out that the goals for team development include:

·      Identify objectives and set priorities.
·      Examine the team’s content or task performance.
·      Analyze the group process, that is, how the group is functioning.
·      Improve communications and relationships among group members.
·      Improve the team’s ability to solve problems.
·      Decrease unhealthy competition and increase cooperation among team members.
·      Work more effectively with other teams in the organization.
·      Increase team members’ respect for one another’s individual differences.

            I believe all teams could benefit from high-performing organization. For instance, in my organization, the medical field, you can find that in order to make a day work, each person needs to be in agreement as to what their roles pertain. High performing teams depend a whole lot on their clear communication and vision towards a common goal. And although, conflict is a “necessary evil,” in the long run it will teach the team to “solve conflict” in more effective ways. Thus, without a specific plan, my organization would be a chaotic team.

            Nevertheless, at this point, my organization could definitely use a similar activity as my sometimes, the front office assistants and back office medical assistants do not work collaboratively. On the contrary, we lack on trust when one of them finds something to be in disagreement and instead of fixing the conflict with that person, they rather accuse the person with a higher authority. In other instances, our team does not take risks or we are not “peak teams’” as we do not have each other’s back. And lastly, we do not carry though as a team, as some team members want to gain personal recognition over anything.

References

Brown, D. R. (2011). An experiential approach to organization development (8th edition.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Chao, M. (2008). Eco Seagate 2008 1/3 [YouTube Video]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCOfOFMiLtE&feature=youtu.be

Chao, M. (2008). Eco Seagate 2008 2/3 [YouTube Video. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Etwuap-_Azk

Miller, D. L. (2003). The stages of group development: A retrospective study of dynamic team processes. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 20(2), 121. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.libproxy.db.erau.edu/docview/204869662?accountid=27203

No comments:

Post a Comment