A520.5.3.RB – Forrestor’s Empowerment
The
article, “Empowering: Rejuvenating a potent idea” by Russ Forrester suggest
innovative way on handling empowerment within organization. It is mainly
focused on the idea that many companies do not know how to make use of it and
how it is affecting them. As the article continues, it s obvious that “one-size
fits all” cannot be implemented with everyone in the same manner, as everyone
needs different empowerment and delegation. Some of the suggestions offered by
the article are: “enlarge power, be sure of what you want to do, differentiate
among employees, support power sharers, build fitting systems, and focus on
results” (Forester, 2000, para. 2).
Similarly,
Whetten and Cameron (2011), chapter on “Empowering and Delegating,” focuses on
the importance of learning to empower and delegate others in
organizations. Their main concern lands
on making employees or followers, part of a single unit. Moreover, they
describe empowerment as a way of making employees want to do their job, rather
than making them do it. There is a significant difference when it comes to
comparing empowerment and power. Empowerment is described as a way of utilizing
authority experience into inspiring or motivation to others. Whereas power
utilizes authority to push others into delivering expected results for the
company’s benefit. “To empower means to enable; it means to help people develop
a sense of self-confidence; it means to help people overcome feelings of
powerlessness or helplessness; it means to energize people to take action; it
means to mobilize intrinsic motivation to accomplish a task” (Whetten &
Cameron, 2011, p. 445).
Additionally,
the chapter mentions five core dimensions of empowerment: (1) Self-efficacy,
(2) Self-determination, (3) Personal consequence, (4) Meaning, and (5) Trust.
These dimensions of empowerment represent a successful empowerment skill where
empirical evidence is clear and individuals tend to perform better. When
compared to Forester’s article, he mentions six short circuits to
organizational empowerment: (1) Precipitous empowerment mandates, (2) Overreliance
on a narrow psychological concept, (3) One-size-fits-all empowerment, (4)
Negligence of the needs of power sharers, (5) Piecemeal approaches, and (6)
Distortions of accountability. The six circuits mentioned before are ways on
how to empower others incorrectly. “This is not empowerment; it is a retractable
leash. The irony is that these organizations overpower both managers and
employees in the name of empowerment. This is not a good way to start”
(Forester, 2000, para. 10).
In
conclusion, both the article and the chapter provide a good source of
information regarding empowerment and delegation, while demonstrating positive
and negative ways to lead an organization. There is an immense misunderstanding
about empowerment as leaders or managers believe their power is revoked when
they empower others. Empowering is only a mean to enhance the morale of the
organization. Providing employees the opportunity to work on their own
leadership skills and initiative, empowering them will only help into the
organization’s future success. Furthermore, “empowered employees are more
productive, psychologically and physically healthy, proactive and innovative,
persistent in work, trustworthy, interpersonally effective, intrinsically
motivated, and have higher morale and commitment than employees who are not
empowered” (Whetten & Cameron, 2011, p. 472).
References
Forester, R. (2000). Empowerment: Rejuvenating a potent
idea. ProQuest Central August 2000; Retrieved from: http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.libproxy.db.erau.edu/docview/210518384/fulltextPDF
Whetten, D., & Cameron, K. (2011). Developing Management
Skills (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education.