Sunday, August 16, 2015

A630.1.4.RB_DellElceCamila

A630.1.4.RB – Board of Directors

            What entails an organization? Harry C. Carter, a municipal fire protection consultant defines organization as “the pattern of ways in which people, too numerous to have face-to-face contact at all times and engaged in a wide range of tasks, relate to one another in a conscious systematic manner; for the accomplishment of mutually acceptable goals” (2014, para. 2). Many times, it seems as if organizations are set up to fail when in reality, the answer to fix the problem is at anybody’s reach. In my experience, I have seen my organization go through the phase of loosing what matters, vision, power, and the crowd. When you are at that point, your crowd no longer feels the need to follow the organization. Instead, the organization suffers a lost of morale and that is when pessimism and pragmatism take place; they take over an entire organization.

            The medical facility I work for underwent significant problems. It all started when the office added a new practice manager for the medical assistants. Previously, there was only one manager who was in charge of the human resources and the personnel aspect of the organization but the owner of the practice noticed the personnel was suffering because it was too much work for one person. When the new practice manager started, as with any change, there was a lot of push back. The practice manager was a person with leadership skills who care about her employees compared to the other manager. She had a vision to where she wanted to take the organization. She started by creating a training manual for everyone as before training was done only when the time was available and employees could only count on their on notes. 

            My practice manager wanted to start an organization full of teamwork, where she did not have to tell everyone what to do and what to help with. Nevertheless, employees were very pessimistic about the entire change. And as it is expected, those who were pessimistic started to recruit others into following same behaviors and would do anything to make office practice manager look bad. Gary Yukl described leadership as, “the process of influencing others to understand and agree about what needs to be done and how to do it, and the process of facilitating individual and collective efforts to accomplish shared objectives” (2013, p. 7). When the practice manager started to notice how the organization was becoming apart, is when she started to be more pragmatic. A full staff meeting was setup and all the issues were discussed. She requested for everyone to be honest with her either with the group setting or in private in to make improvements to the office and create a “happy medium.”
           
            She was definitely a “go-getter,” and had the power to make others listen to her vision. After that meeting, more employees were able to understand where she came from and where she wanted to direct the team. The crowd started to follow her without hesitation and the changes started within the employees and simultaneously reflected on the organization. Although, our leader did the impossible to make others understand that “a better future is possible” (Kohn, 2007), there will always be a pessimistic crowd.

            When it comes to a healthy normally functioning company, some characters are needed. I believe, pessimistic agents are not necessary because completely put the organization’s morale down. On the other hand, a pragmatic agent is different. Pragmatic agents tend to be realistic and more often than not, will take into consideration all the possibilities and create a prognosis accordingly without directly rejecting an idea. Moreover, visionaries are the key to the success of an organization. Visionary agents are the bridge to the future as it is shown on the video “ A tale of power and vision.” In order to move forward, we need to know where are we heading and that is what a vision is good for. Power encourages others into doing the impossible and motivates those who have doubts. And lastly, the crowd is also important. A leader can be a leader to him or her self but an organization needs the crowd to make anything happen. The crowd is in charge of putting to work theories that leaders believe will work. They are the testers.
           
References

Carter, H. R. (2014). Do you know what an organization is? Firehouse.Com, Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.libproxy.db.erau.edu/docview/1573068517?accountid=27203

Kohn, S. (2007). A tale of power and vision. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZVIWZGheXY&feature=youtu.be

Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations. (8th ed.) Dorling Kindersley / Pearson Education, Inc.


No comments:

Post a Comment